Welcome to the International Journal of System Design and Computing (IJSDC)
The Editorial Workflow:
The Editorial responsibilities can be broadly classified as follows:
The papers are initially submitted to the journals by the authors.These paper submissions can be through either online websites or email.
The Editors check whether the submitted paper strictly follows all the instructions mentioned in the author guidelines.The quality of the paper is not checked at this point.
The Chief Editor checks whether the paper is original,new and interesting and the technologies used are modern.If not, the Editor-in-Chief rejects the paper and it is not moved further.
The Editor-in-Chief assigns an Associate Editor-in-Chief for handling the peer review.If needed, they are assigned at this stage.
The Editor sends invitations to the selected reviewers for reviewing the papers with the date mentioned in it. The reviewers can accept or reject the invitation. If rejected, further invitations are issued until the required number of reviewers are achieved.
The reviewers accepts or rejects the invitation based on their availability and also by following the reviewer guidelines.If they rejects,it is possible that they might also suggest another reviewer.
Editors have the complete responsibility to accept or reject the manuscript depending on the reviews obtained from the reviewers. Every manuscript should be treated as a confidential document by the editor. It is prohibited for editors to use any submitted manuscripts in their own research. Editors should have no conflict of interest on the articles they accept or reject. It is the editor’s responsibility to ensure that the peer-review process is conducted to a high standard. Double blind review process must be ensured by the editors.
The Editor considers all the returned papers after the review and checks for a valid reason for returning.If he finds a difference, then he assigns another reviewer to review the same paper.
The Editor sends a decision mail to the authors with the relevant comments.The comments may not depend on the types of peer review that the journal operates.
If the paper is accepted, it is sent for production.If rejected or sent back for major or minor corrections, the editor must mention what are all the corrections should be made including the suggestions given by the reviewer.At this point, an email should also be sent to the reviewers for letting them know about the outcome of their review.The sent back papers are expected to come back with a new version.In case of minor corrections,the editors can take the role of a reviewer before sending it for production.
How to become an Editor?
It is with great pleasure that we extend our invitation to you to join the editorial board or reviewer program at Research Point India Publication journals, and we appreciate you reading the terms and conditions carefully.
Advantages
To have some experience publishing articles, we require our editorial board members and reviewers to be leaders in their fields. Reviewers are crucial to the peer-review process since their comments determine whether an article will be accepted or rejected. To improve the calibre of our publications, all members are urged to evaluate the papers that have been submitted to them without prejudice. There is no set formula for how to evaluate an article; it all depends on its value, calibre, and uniqueness. When checking the article, keep the following things in mind.
Responsibilities
For us to succeed, we need members of our editorial board and reviewers to be top experts in their fields with some experience in publishing articles. Reviewers play an important role in peer-review because their comments determine whether an article will be accepted or rejected. Our journals require all members to test out all articles without bias in order to increase their quality. Analyzing an article depends on worthiness, quality, and originality and there are no hard and fast rules. During the verification process, it is important to keep the following points in mind:
Agreement
Your appointment as a member of the editorial board or a reviewer for Research Point India Publication journals is confirmed by your acceptance of the terms and conditions listed below.
Termination
You need to finish the word exactly as indicated. The conditions listed below may cause this agreement to end at any time.
Please send your application to the following email address if you’d like to be an editorial member or reviewer:
Peer Review Policy and Procedure
At kitspress, we strive to remain transparent, fair, thorough, and objective throughout our peer review process, which is periodically updated.
All submissions to Springer journals are first reviewed for completeness and only then sent to be assessed by an Editor who will decide whether they are suitable for peer review. Where an Editor is on the author list or has any other competing interest regarding a specific manuscript, another member of the Editorial Board will be assigned to oversee peer review. Editors will consider the peer-reviewed reports when making a decision, but are not bound by the opinions or recommendations therein. A concern raised by a single peer reviewer or the Editor themself may result in the manuscript being rejected. Authors receive peer review reports with the editorial decision on their manuscript.
Proceedings papers are reviewed by the Programme Chairs and Programme Committee members of the respective conference, with help from external reviewers selected by them.
The chief editor also chooses peer reviewers for the journal. Typically, a candidate should be the first or second author on at least two peer-reviewed research publications that have been published.
As long as the authors have sufficiently eliminated any identifying information from the article, the peer-review process is double-blinded, meaning neither the identity of the peer reviewers nor the identity of the authors is revealed to either party. Prior to submitting their manuscript, writers must make sure that all such identifying information has been sufficiently removed. Both decision editors and peer reviewers may be suggested by authors, but the journal is under no obligation to take these recommendations.
A submitted manuscript is a confidential communication, and peer reviewers are not permitted to keep, distribute, or copy it unless the decision editor has given permission to do so, such as when seeking confidential feedback from a colleague who is also required to maintain the same level of confidentiality. If an author challenges an editor’s judgement, the editor-in-chief will evaluate the appeal and may consult with one or more senior editors as well as the decision editor who handled the submission. The editor-in-chief has the option of upholding the original decision or allowing the authors to submit the manuscript again for a new round of peer review by a new decision editor and set of reviewers. Based on the particular manuscript, other strategies might be suitable.
An erratum notice or other notification of the issue will be published in the journal as soon as practical if a work that has already been published is later discovered to have mistakes or significant defects.
The journal will deal with allegations of misconduct in the peer review or publication process to the greatest extent practicable; nonetheless, it may be necessary for the employer of a participant, a granting agency, or a regulatory body to conduct a more thorough investigation of the alleged misconduct. Beyond the prospective publication of findings as they relate to the scientific record, the journal has no authority to penalise one or more individuals; this authority belongs to an employer, awarding agency, or regulatory body.
Peer reviewer guidance
The primary purpose of peer review is providing the Editor with the information needed to reach a fair, evidence-based decision that adheres to the journal’s editorial criteria. Review reports should also help authors revise their paper such that it may be accepted for publication.
Special Issues: An Overview
In addition to regular articles in our journal, we also publish special issues that address emerging areas within our discipline, or provide detailed analyses of a key topic being researched. The conferences are organized by renowned experts in the field, and they attract articles of the highest level of quality. You may submit proposals for a special issue at any time during the year, and they should be sent to queries@kitspresss.org
kitspress Publications welcomes researchers to serve as Lead Guest Editors for Special Issues if their work is in line with the objectives and focus of one of our journals.
In addition to advancing research on the selected topic, guest editing a special issue serves to position the lead guest editor as an authority on the field. The Guest Editorial Team may also produce one review article and one editorial.
This guide sets out the steps involved in proposing, preparing and launching a Special Issue.
kitspress Journals relies on the Lead Guest Editor’s expertise as a subject matter expert to decide which issues call for the extensive investigation and analysis that a Special Issue entails. The subject must fall within the Lead Guest Editor’s expertise, so they are comfortable handling manuscripts on the topic. Additionally, it need to be consistent with the journal’s objectives and focus.
After a subject has been chosen, the Lead Guest Editor is tasked with putting together a small group of Guest Editors and creating a proposal. Two to four suitably competent Guest Editors are normally invited by the Lead Guest Editor to join the Special Issue Editorial Team. These guest editors will be in charge of handling the manuscripts that have been submitted and overseeing the peer review procedure. Guest editors should have the necessary time and resources to handle manuscripts, as well as employment in the relevant subject. Contacting and confirming the involvement of Guest Editors is the responsibility of the Lead Guest Editor. The proposal is actually a draught Call for Papers that should contain the following information: The journal for which the Special Issue is intended.
An idea for the Special Issue’s heading (should not exceed 10 words).
Proposed Aims and Scope, describing the intended focus of the Special Issue and listing the subjects to be covered.
A list of two to four guest editors, including information about each one such as their names, email addresses, affiliations, and a brief bio (one paragraph). You should also add your personal information here.
A suggested programme and timetable.
When submitting a proposal, it is vital to give an explanation of
When complete, the proposal should be forwarded to queries@kitspresss.org.
Annual Subscription
Both print and online journals are published by The Research Point India Publications. As a self-sustaining business, kitspress does not receive funding from institutions or the government. As a result, the journal’s operations are entirely supported by the meagre processing costs that authors pay and by yearly memberships. Since the journals are open access, as an Open Access Publisher, kitspress does not charge for an online subscription.
To acquire kitspress journal paperback copies, Send the proposal mail to the editor (queries@kitspresss.org).
Mention in the subject column as “Annual Print Subscription” Download Subscription form
All costs for subscriptions include postage and taxes and must be paid in advance. Subscribers are asked to post their order as soon as they can. Issues will only be issued if payment has been received. A subscription is submitted once a year from January to December, and the payment method is either $/€ or INR. The renewal of subscriptions is possible in later years. Prices are subject to modification with our prior notification.
Remember that
Furthermore, kitspress reserves the right to send a copy of the upcoming edition of the journal or a journal that is closely related to the discipline for which a subscription has been made if kitspress is unable to publish an edition due to a lack of high-quality papers, requests from researchers, unanticipated events, etc.
Please visit the kitspress Journals homepage for a complete list of the journal collection, including publication frequency and indexing.
Journals are sent by registered Air-Mail to all countries except the INDIA where journals sent by surface mail.
Due to increases in the volume and cost of fulfilling missing journal claims generally, kitspress will no longer provide replacement issues when an issue is claimed undelivered.
Renewal notices are mailed, and cancellations will be accepted during the renewal period. All cancellations must be made in writing. No cancellations will be accepted after the first issue of a subscription has mailed.
In the fall of each year, the kitspress will send out renewal notices to both individuals and institutes with information on how to renew.
Subscription payments are due within the first quarter of the year (March 30) to receive the full calendar year of issues. There may be additional charges for subscriptions ordered after this period due to increased claims and shipping costs related to late ordering.
Please contact queries@kitspresss.org.